| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-bug: 647462
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647868
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1.9.2 has been moved to the archive location.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647320
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No point using virtual/libelf as we only need to cater for Linux and
not FreeBSD, which Oracle do not support.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646750
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.21, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646198
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/625842
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/638036
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
webkit-gtk:2 is vulnerable and unmaintained. Straight to stable
because this is very long overdue and dropping a flag is fairly safe.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/645268
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/645268
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.20, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I doubt the MacOS examples were working before.
The pkg_nofetch stuff was needlessly complicated as ${A} already
contains just the relevant files and the function is not called at all
if all files are present.
I noticed that all the demo files follow a pattern, except on MacOS
for some bizarre reason. I doubt any demo files will disappear before
Java 8 is EOL'd but this can easily be handled in the case statement.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6886
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6886
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/6886
|