aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>2017-12-08 15:33:55 -0500
committerSergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>2017-12-08 15:33:55 -0500
commit92469284a650232768523564f2c715c4ebb57906 (patch)
tree3393e764d2e67ab28c03c95f1cf4421881f44094 /gdb/dtrace-probe.c
parentClear non-significant bits of address in watchpoint (diff)
downloadbinutils-gdb-92469284a650232768523564f2c715c4ebb57906.tar.gz
binutils-gdb-92469284a650232768523564f2c715c4ebb57906.tar.bz2
binutils-gdb-92469284a650232768523564f2c715c4ebb57906.zip
Fix thinko on dtrace-probe.c:dtrace_process_dof_probe
While investigating PR gdb/22557 ("Regression: gdb.base/dtrace-probe.exp"), I noticed that the code is wrongly declaring a new "expression_up" variable inside the TRY block in "dtrace_process_dof_probe". This causes the outter "expr" variable to be empty, which may have an impact later when evaluating the expression. This commit fixes that. Unfortunately the script used to test DTrace probes (gdb/testsuite/lib/pdtrace.in) is not very reliable so I cannot say whether this commit fixes the PR mentioned above. Nonetheless, it's an obvious fix and should go in. gdb/ChangeLog: 2017-12-08 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> * dtrace-probe.c (dtrace_process_dof_probe): Do not declare a new "expression_up" inside the TRY block.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/dtrace-probe.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/dtrace-probe.c9
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/dtrace-probe.c b/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
index 1c88f890540..3314445f98a 100644
--- a/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
+++ b/gdb/dtrace-probe.c
@@ -486,17 +486,16 @@ dtrace_process_dof_probe (struct objfile *objfile,
TRY
{
- expression_up expr
- = parse_expression_with_language (type_str.c_str (),
- language_c);
+ expr = parse_expression_with_language (type_str.c_str (),
+ language_c);
}
CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
}
END_CATCH
- if (expr != NULL && expr->elts[0].opcode == OP_TYPE)
- type = expr->elts[1].type;
+ if (expr != NULL && expr.get ()->elts[0].opcode == OP_TYPE)
+ type = expr.get ()->elts[1].type;
args.emplace_back (type, std::move (type_str), std::move (expr));
}