summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: 2da99b2841d6ec168049b71cb68d9a32f6400985 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
From 637cc045ee464909c261d6fa16c71ed15cd455e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Xu <351006+Hello71@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:58:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] build-sys: Update configure.ac

1. the test incorrectly used AC_COMPILE_IFELSE instead of
   AC_LINK_IFELSE, defeating the purpose of checking -lcrypt.
2. the test did not properly restore LIBS, causing later checks to all
   fail if libcrypt wasn't found.
3. HAVE_LIBCRYPT only controls whether to use -lcrypt, it is not
   needed or used in any source files.

[kzak@redhat.com: - improve commit message
                  - use UL_{SET,RESTORE}_FLAGS() rather than directly
		    modify $LIBS]

Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
---
 configure.ac | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 5181d524c..939c6d2d3 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -845,8 +845,8 @@ char *c = crypt("abc","pw");
   have_libcrypt=no
   have_crypt=yes
 ],[
-  LIBS="$LIBS -lcrypt"
-  AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
+  UL_SET_FLAGS([], [], [-lcrypt])
+  AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
   #ifdef HAVE_CRYPT_H
   #include <crypt.h>
   #else
@@ -856,12 +856,12 @@ char *c = crypt("abc","pw");
   ]], [[
   char *c = crypt("abc","pw");
   ]])],[
-  AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBCRYPT], [1], [Do we need -lcrypt?])
   have_libcrypt=yes
   have_crypt=yes
   ],[
   AC_MSG_WARN([crypt() is not available])
   ])
+  UL_RESTORE_FLAGS
 ])
 AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_LIBCRYPT], [test "x$have_libcrypt" = xyes])